Civil servants own got been pushing book transit (busses, shuttles, trolleys, street cars, subways, elevated trains) every chip the solution to traffic congestion also equally gridlock for 100 years. Obviously, that's bullshit, but aspect at New York, it's had book transit, for the same 100 years, also equally fifty-fifty thence has gridlock also equally congested traffic. So, what unopen the consider of making wider roads? Why is it that it was the solution when all we had were single ii oestrus roads, also equally thence when adding a lane to exceed inwards the other management (a route became a highway) traffic moved much faster inwards each direction. When we needed fifty-fifty more than relief a s lane was added inwards both directions. (Highway became freeway/interstate) but thence the city planners also equally transportation experts said that was the limit. Adding more than lanes, they said, would entirely worsen the problem, also equally no affair how many lanes